With all of the talk of the Federal Reserve taking action and raising rates in the coming month, focus has turned once again toward duration. Duration is a measure of interest rate sensitivity (the percentage change in the price of a bond for a 100 basis point move in rates), so the lower the duration the less sensitive those bonds are to interest rate movements per the calcuation. Lower duration bonds would not eliminate the interest rate impact, just lessen it.
By nature of the shorter maturities and higher yields, the high yield bond market generally has a shorter duration than investment grade and municipal bonds, meaning high yield bonds are less sensitive to interest rate moves. Yet even within the high yield bond market we are seeing some products and vehicles with a lower duration than others.
Like most aspects of investing, you don’t want to consider duration in a vacuum, investing only according to what vehicle has the lowest duration. As noted above, duration measures a price change due to a rate move, but the price changed needs to be coupled with the portfolio’s yield to get a better idea of the expected return under various scenarios. Let’s look at some of scenarios to see how this plays out.
First, let’s hypothetically say you could achieve a portfolio with a duration of 2.5 years, so a 100 bps change in rates over 6mos would mean that the price of your portfolio would theoretically decline by 2.5%. If your starting current yield on the portfolio was 7.5%, meaning you theoretically generate 3.75% of income over that 6mos, then you are looking at a theoretical net gain of 1.25% (3.75% – 2.5%) over the period of rising rates. However, if you can build a portfolio in the high yield bond and loan market investing according to both maximizing yield and considering duration (keep in mind, loans are floating rate obligations so can serve to lower a portfolio’s duration), let’s say you can build a portfolio with a duration of 3.0 years and a current yield of around 10%. In this case, your theoretical sensitivity to a 100bps movement over 6mos would be a price change of 3.0%, but you would be theoretically generating 5% of income over the 6mos, so your net theoretical gain would be 2.0%. If that 100bps interest rate movement is over a year instead of 6 months, that yield benefit gets even larger, putting you at a theoretical net gain of 5% for the hypothetical short duration portfolio versus a theoretical gain of 7% for the higher yielding portfolio.1 And of course, if rates don’t move or even decline from current levels, then the higher yielding portfolio would not only benefit from the higher starting yield but potentially a theoretical positive price movement per the duration calculation.
Below we graphically depict a few more scenarios that show how duration and yield would theoretically interplay during periods of rising rates for a variety of scenarios.2
As you can see, a higher yield can go a long way in making up for relatively small differences in duration. Again, while the high yield bond market naturally has a lower duration relative to other fixed income alternatives, it is still important to factor the yield into the equation as you consider your interest rate exposure for the wide variety of high yield vehicles and products offered. We believe there are benefits to active management whereby managers have the flexibility to build a portfolio that not only maximizes yield but also lowers duration (for instance, the ability to include low duration floating rate bank loans in addition to high yield bonds), as this may provide less interest rate sensitivity and may allow you to better address your interest rate risk relative to the broader high yield market and other products without this same flexibility.